The UAE’s Costs of the US-Israel Conflict with Iran
Iran has issued warnings that military action against its territory could lead to a wider regional conflict. The consequences of these threats, however, have disproportionately affected the Gulf Arab states, particularly the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Regional Turmoil and UAE’s Position
Despite Iran’s warnings, both the United States and Israel have seemingly dismissed them as empty threats. Eleven days post-conflict ignition, the UAE appears to be bearing the brunt of the fallout. Reports indicate that over 1,700 missiles and drones have been targeted at the UAE since the onset of hostilities, though more than 90% have been intercepted by the country’s defense systems. This extensive assault reflects not only the unrest in the region but also Iran’s willingness to project its power.
U.S. President Donald Trump noted in a recent interview that Iran’s aggressiveness toward its Arab neighbors was unexpectedly high. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps of Iran has designated a significant portion of its military might to striking what it calls “U.S. interests” in surrounding Arab nations while simultaneously directing efforts toward Israel. As the struggle intensifies, the UAE has emerged as a focal point for Iranian missile strikes, arguably more so than Israel, resulting in civilian casualties amid the chaos.
The Economic Impact and Perception
Dubai, a significant hub for globalization, has inadvertently found itself at the heart of this turbulence. Fawaz Gerges, a professor at the London School of Economics, explains that Iran views Dubai as a key player in Western economic structures. Therefore, any attacks within its boundaries can generate widespread implications beyond just local disturbances. The psychological impact of strikes, even if they don’t result in injuries, influences international perceptions and could deter expatriates and tourists from remaining in the region.
Historically, the UAE has been an economic lifeline for Iran, particularly during stringent sanctions. Despite the rising tensions, trade relationships have revealed a paradoxical dependency, with upcoming figures suggesting bilateral trade could reach $28 billion by 2024. However, trust appears to have deteriorated, and normalization of relations may take decades. As around half a million Iranians reside in the UAE, the complexities of this relationship could play a pivotal role as the situation unfolds.
The Broader Implications for U.S.-UAE Dynamics
Iran’s strikes on the UAE are not just random acts of aggression; they are strategic. The UAE is viewed through the lens of its longstanding alliance with the United States, making it a prime target for Iran’s militaristic strategies. The Emirati government has heavily invested in American defense systems, a crucial factor currently protecting its citizens from unprecedented assaults.
Sanam Vakil from Chatham House suggests that attacking the UAE serves multiple purposes for Iran. It underlines that even a nation housing millions of expatriates, and that is vital in global finance, cannot remain immune from conflict. Geographically, the proximity makes the UAE an easier target compared to other regional players like Jordan or Israel, which possess robust air defense systems. This instant accessibility amplifies the urgency for Emirati authorities to address their security concerns.
President Mohamed bin Zayed al Nahyan recently visited the injured and cautioned adversaries not to underestimate the resilience of the UAE. The initial shock of being a major target has quickly morphed into anger among the populace. As sentiment shifts from outrage over initial strikes to a deeper indignation against Iran, the dynamics of this conflict may evolve. The fleeting hope from Iranian apologies has dissipated amid ongoing threats, creating a landscape of unease and uncertainty. While signs of normalcy persist in Dubai, the undercurrents of conflict continue to influence its residents’ outlook on security and stability.
